Can a wretched imposter who claims messengership and prophethood 
                for himself have any belief in the Holy Quran? And can a man who 
                believes in the Holy Quran, and believes the verse He is 
                the Messenger of Allah and the Khatam an-nabiyyin 
                to be the word of God, say that he too is a messenger and prophet 
                after the Holy Prophet Muhammad? 
               Insaf-i Talb [pen-name of the enquirer] should remember 
                that I have never, at any time, made a claim of nubuwwat 
                or risalat [prophethood or messengership] in the real sense. 
                To use a word in a non-real sense, and to employ it in speech 
                according to its broad, root meaning, does not imply heresy (kufr). 
                However, I do not like even this much, for there is the possibility 
                that ordinary Muslims may misunderstand it. 
               However, by virtue of being appointed by God, I cannot conceal 
                those revelations I have received from Him in which the words 
                nubuwwat and risalat occur quite frequently. But 
                I say repeatedly that, in these revelations, the word mursal 
                or rasul or nabi which has occurred about me is 
                not used in its real sense. (Footnote: Such words have not occurred 
                only now, but have been present in my published revelations for 
                sixteen years. So you will find many such revelations about me 
                in the book Barahin Ahmadiyya.) The actual fact, to 
                which I testify with the highest testimony, is that our Holy Prophet, 
                may peace and the blessings of God be upon him, is the Khatam 
                al-anbiya and after him no prophet is to come, neither an 
                old one nor a new one. 
               But it must be remembered that, as we have explained here, sometimes 
                the revelation from God contains such words about some of His 
                saints in a metaphorical and figurative sense; they are not meant 
                by way of reality. This is the whole controversy which the 
                foolish, prejudiced people have dragged in a different direction. 
                The name prophet of God for the Promised Messiah, 
                which is to be found in Sahih Muslim etc. from the blessed 
                tongue of the Holy Prophet, is meant in the same metaphorical 
                sense as that in which it occurs in Sufi literature as an accepted 
                and common term for the recipient of Divine communication. Otherwise, 
                how can there be a prophet after the Khatam al-anbiya?              
               (Anjam Atham, footnote, pages 2728)